Call For A Free Consultation
202-895-2799
This case study is based on real estate planning scenarios. Certain identifying details have been modified to protect client confidentiality.
When many parents think about estate planning, they focus on who will receive their assets. While that is certainly important, some of the most meaningful estate planning conversations have very little to do with money.
At The Law Offices of Clifford M. Cohen, we often help parents answer a different question:
“What opportunities do we want our children to have if we are no longer here to provide them ourselves?”
This case study highlights how one Washington DC family approached estate planning not simply as a wealth transfer strategy, but as a way to provide flexibility, guidance, and long term support for their children.
A married couple in their early forties came to our office with two children, ages 8 and 11. They had built a successful life together and accumulated approximately $3.5 million in assets.
Like many parents, they initially believed estate planning would focus primarily on deciding who inherited their property. However, as our conversations progressed, a more important theme emerged.
They were not concerned about dividing assets equally.
They were concerned about creating equal opportunities.
The parents understood that children rarely follow identical paths. One child may require additional educational support. Another may pursue graduate school. One may face unexpected healthcare challenges. Another may become financially independent at an earlier age.
Their goal was to create an estate plan that could adapt to those realities rather than force future decisions into a rigid formula.
One of the most thoughtful discussions involved the concept of fairness.
Many estate plans divide assets into equal shares immediately after both parents pass away. While simple, that approach can sometimes create unintended consequences.
The parents recognized that their children’s needs during adolescence and young adulthood might be dramatically different.
For example:
The parents wanted a structure that would allow resources to be allocated based on actual needs while preserving fairness over the long term.
To accomplish this goal, we designed a trust structure that kept assets together in a common trust after both parents passed away.
Rather than immediately separating assets into two individual shares, the trust would continue until the youngest child either reached age 25 or completed college.
This structure provided flexibility during the years when children often experience the greatest financial needs and life transitions.
Most importantly, it allowed the trustee to make decisions based on each child’s circumstances rather than following a predetermined formula.
Life rarely unfolds exactly as parents expect.
Recognizing this reality, the trust included provisions allowing the trustee to make unequal distributions when appropriate.
This authority is commonly referred to as a “sprinkle” provision.
The trustee could distribute income or principal based on a child’s individual circumstances, including educational opportunities, healthcare needs, or other legitimate concerns.
This approach reflected the parents’ belief that fairness is not always measured by identical distributions. Sometimes fairness means responding appropriately to each child’s unique situation.
While much of the conversation focused on the children, the parents also recognized the importance of planning for their own future.
Like many families, they wanted to ensure that someone could step in and make decisions if illness or injury prevented them from managing their affairs.
As part of their comprehensive estate planning strategy, we established a Disability Panel designed to determine incapacity if concerns arose in the future.
We also prepared durable powers of attorney and advance medical directives to ensure trusted individuals could assist with financial and healthcare decisions when necessary.
These documents helped create a clear decision making process while reducing the risk of family disagreements during stressful circumstances.
The clients also wanted to ensure that the surviving spouse would remain financially secure after the first death.
To accomplish this, we established a marital trust that allowed the surviving spouse to continue managing and benefiting from trust assets.
This provided stability while preserving future planning opportunities for the children.
The trust structure also offered flexibility to address future estate tax concerns if the family’s wealth continued to grow.
Although the family’s current estate was manageable, we recognized an important long term consideration.
Washington DC does not allow portability of its estate tax exemption between spouses.
Because the clients were relatively young and their assets were likely to appreciate significantly over time, future estate tax exposure could become a concern.
To preserve planning opportunities, the estate plan gave the surviving spouse the option to create a family trust after the first death.
This strategy helped preserve both spouses’ estate tax exemptions and provided flexibility should future tax planning become necessary.
Another important discussion centered on responsibility.
The parents did not want their children to receive substantial assets immediately upon reaching adulthood.
Instead, they wanted to encourage financial maturity and gradual independence.
When the common trust eventually terminated, separate trusts would be established for each child.
The children would not receive assets outright. Instead, each trust would continue providing protection and oversight until age 35, when each child could become trustee of his or her own trust.
This approach allowed the parents to balance independence with protection while encouraging thoughtful financial decision making.
At its core, this estate plan was never really about money.
It was about values.
The parents wanted to encourage education, support opportunity, provide flexibility, and prepare their children for adulthood.
The legal documents and trust structures served those goals, but they were not the goals themselves.
By focusing on the family’s priorities rather than simply dividing assets, the plan became a roadmap for how the parents wanted to support their children long after they were gone.
Families with minor children often face estate planning decisions that extend far beyond asset distribution.
Questions about education, healthcare, guardianship, financial maturity, and family values can all shape the structure of an estate plan.
A properly designed estate plan allows parents to provide guidance and flexibility while preparing children for future success.
Whether your goal is protecting young children, planning for future educational opportunities, or creating a framework for responsible inheritance, thoughtful planning today can provide lasting benefits for decades to come.
At The Law Offices of Clifford M. Cohen, we help families throughout Washington DC and Maryland create estate plans that reflect their values, protect their loved ones, and prepare future generations for success.
If you would like to discuss your family’s goals and create a plan tailored to your unique circumstances, we invite you to schedule a consultation with our office.
© 2025 Law Offices of Clifford M. Cohen | Phone: 202-895-2799
5335 Wisconsin Ave NW #440, Washington, DC 20015